Legal Opinion

Rotz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 1, 1988PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George Bundy Smith, J.), entered October 3, 1986, which, inter alia, granted the respective motions of the defendants City of New York and Paramount Pictures Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motions denied, and the complaint reinstated against these defendants, without costs.

In this case, the IAS court determined the issues of negligence and proximate cause, as a matter of law, on a motion for summary judgment. An examination of the record indicates that a summary disposition of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Maheshwari v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Florman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Lugo v. LJN Toys, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  5. Logan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API