State Ex Rel. B.A.P.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:
¶ 1 On appeal to the Utah Court of Appeals, Petitioners in these two cases challenged the termination of their parental rights. Acting pursuant to recently, adopted rules of appellate procedure, the court of appeals affirmed the termination orders in both cases based exclusively on a review of the records and the petitions on appeal. On certiorari, Petitioners now argue that the expedited procedures outlined in the appellate rules, and applied by the court of appeals, denied them their constitutional right to a meaningful appeal by precluding full presentation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brown v. GloverUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ClaytonUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- L.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- R.W.K. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- In Interest of BapUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- In re C.J.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- In re K.K. and K.K. (R.W.K. v. State)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- J.F. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.