Legal Opinion
Mai v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 12, 1991No. 90-472CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Senior Judge:
This military pay case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, which plaintiff opposes. Both parties have also moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff Norman E. Mai (Mai), a retired U.S. Air Force captain, seeks back pay and allowances from May 31,1976, the date of his involuntary separation from active duty as a Reserve officer in the Air Force, to October 1, 1984, the date he voluntarily retired from active duty after he subsequently reenlisted in the Air Force.
Mai was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tyger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Allen v. CardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Brooks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bateson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Norman E. Mai, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992