Legal Opinion

Moore v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1946No. Civ. 12980PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODELL,

J.—The appellant sought by mandate to com-

pel the respondents to vacate their order revoking his licenses. This appeal was taken from the order denying a peremptory writ.

In January, 1944, two “off-sale” licenses were issued to appellant by the respondent board, authorizing the sale of wine, beer and distilled spirits for consumption off the licensee’s premises. On March 4, 1944, an information was filed in the federal court charging appellant with a violation of the Emergency Price Control Act in having sold, on February 26, 1944, a quart bottle of whiskey for $8.00 when its “ceiling”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. First Industrial Loan Co. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Marcucci v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Cooper v. State Board of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Jacques, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API