Legal Opinion
Dunbar v. Tulsa Metropolitan Water Authority
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 1961No. 39080PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought this action for themselves and all others similarly situated to permanently enjoin defendants from discontinuing certain water services. Plaintiffs reside in Creek County and they purchase water from the Oaks Country Club which is located in Creek County. For at least 20 years, the City of Tulsa by contract, had furnished the water to the Oaks Country Club and a portion of said water had been resold to plaintiffs. The Oaks Country Club installed and owned all the lines and distribution system and neither the City of Tulsa nor the Tulsa Water Authority owned…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Schofield v. MeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of McAlester v. FoggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Woolley v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Metzger v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. District Court of the Seventh (7th) Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Board of County Commissioners of the County of LeFlore v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- City of Chickasha v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Phillips v. Snug Harbor Water Gas Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979