Legal Opinion

Vela v. Rocha

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 12, 2001No. 13-00-635-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order denying a motion for summary judgment based on the affirmative defense of official immunity. 1 Appellants, Leonel Vela, Karen Hollingsworth, Derric Trevino, Dora Del Toro, and Enedi-na Magana, all employees of the Texas Department of Health (“TDH”), contend the trial court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse and render in part.

A. STANDARD OF REVIEW

When reviewing a traditional summary judgment brought under rule 166a, an appellate court must follow these…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Nueces County v. Ferguson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. City of Arlington v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. City of Seagoville v. Lytle, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Waxahachie Independent School District v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Hidalgo County v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API