Legal Opinion

Koll Real Estate Group, Inc. v. Purseley

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 15, 2004No. 01-02-01330-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.

These case is an interlocutory, accelerated appeal from the trial court’s denial of a special appearance filed by appellant, Koll Real Estate Group, Inc. (Koll). See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (Vernon 2001). The issue we must decide is whether, by accepting an assignment of rights and liabilities under a purchase agreement, and agreeing to indemnify the purchaser for tort damages, some of which allegedly occurred in Texas, Koll has become amenable to suit in Texas, despite its own lack of minimum contacts thereto.

BACKGROUND

A. Procedural…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cappuccitti v. Gulf Industrial Products, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Exito Electronics., Co., Ltd. v. Trejo, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  4. Control Solutions, Inc. v. Gharda Chemicals Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  5. Gales v. Denis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API