Legal Opinion

Control Solutions, Inc. v. Gharda Chemicals Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 13, 2007No. 01-06-00802-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.

Appellants, Control Solutions, Inc. and United Phosphorous, Inc. (collectively, “CSI”), file this interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s order that granted the special appearance motion of Gharda Chemicals, Ltd. (“Gharda Chemicals”). In four issues, CSI argues that the trial court erred when (1) it ruled that it did not have specific jurisdiction over Gharda Chemicals; (2) it failed to consider Gharda Chemicals’s post-injury contacts with Texas in its general jurisdictional analysis; (3) it did not find the exercise of jurisdiction reasonable in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp. v. Lamb, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Nogle & Black Aviation, Inc. v. Faveretto Ex Rel. Migliori, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  3. Semperit Technische Produkte Gesellschaft M.B.H. v. Hennessy ex rel. SmithersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Moore v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. Zack Shahin v. Deyaar Development Corporation USA, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API