Legal Opinion

NOSSK, Inc. v. Fitness Anywhere LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 12, 2022No. 5:21-cv-08914Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NOSSK, INC., Case No. 21-cv-08914-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF 9 v. NOSSK, INC.’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 10 FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC, et al., [Re: ECF No. 28] 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff NOSSK, Inc.’s (“NOSSK”) motion for preliminary injunction 14 against Defendant Fitness Anywhere LLC d.b.a. TRX (“TRX”) in this declaratory judgment action 15 for noninfringement and invalidity of TRX’s patent—U.S. Patent No. 8,083,653 (the “’653 Patent”). 16 This action stems…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API