Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Lensink
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 29, 1988No. (6331)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Richard E. Mahoney, individually and in his capacity as administrator of his son’s estate, and Barbara Mahoney, individually, brought this action against the commissioners of mental health, state police and mental retardation.1 They *132alleged that the death of their son, while a patient at Norwich Hospital, was caused by the defendants’ negligent, wanton, and willful misconduct, and that the defendants deprived their son of his personal, property and civil rights in violation of General Statutes § 17-206b, and of his right to receive humane and dignified treatment in violation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Wyatt v. AderholtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Roach v. RoachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Wilson v. Midway Games, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Joseph Belliveau, Sr., and Rosemary Belliveau v. Christopher StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.