Legal Opinion

Boomer v. Waterman Family Ltd. Partnership

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 2, 2017No. 1783/15PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eyler, James R., J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the Board of County Commissioners of Queen Anne’s County (“the County Commissioners”) had the authority to rescind a previously adopted ordinance in which they had approved the rezoning of a parcel of land that had been annexed and rezoned by the Town of Queenstown. We answer that question in the affirmative.

On November 25, 2014, by a vote of three to two, the County Commissioners adopted Resolution 14-31, which approved Queenstown’s new zoning classification for the annexed parcel that allowed land uses substantially different, or at a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Dasch v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Dal Maso v. County Commrs.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. Norris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Tyma v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dabbs v. Anne Arundel Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Waterman Family Ltd. Partnership v. BoomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Modell v. Waterman Family Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Waterman Family Ltd. P'ship v. BoomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API