Carlson v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
After all the testimony was introduced the defendant requested the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, and assigns error of the court in refusing to so instruct.
It should be stated that the street-car of defendant on Sandy Boulevard makes its stop for East 40th Street at East 39th Street, there being no stop at East 40th Street.
The plaintiff testified as a witness in his own behalf in regard to the circumstances attending the accident, to the effect that at the date alleged he got on the street-car at 80th Street, about a quarter to 8 o’clock, when it was cloudy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Sonniksen v. Hood River Gas & Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Hagermann v. Chapman Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Eugene School District No. 4 v. FiskOregon Supreme Court · 1938