Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

After all the testimony was introduced the defendant requested the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, and assigns error of the court in refusing to so instruct.

It should be stated that the street-car of defendant on Sandy Boulevard makes its stop for East 40th Street at East 39th Street, there being no stop at East 40th Street.

The plaintiff testified as a witness in his own behalf in regard to the circumstances attending the accident, to the effect that at the date alleged he got on the street-car at 80th Street, about a quarter to 8 o’clock, when it was cloudy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Sonniksen v. Hood River Gas & Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hagermann v. Chapman Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Eugene School District No. 4 v. FiskOregon Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API