Legal Opinion

State v. Lo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1983No. 8741PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The State of Hawaii (the State) gathered evidence incriminating Dr. Pershing S. Lo (the defendant) by installing electronic viewing, amplifying, and recording devices in a hotel room to which he had been lured by a patient feigning, under the direction of law enforcement officers with whom she was cooperating, an urgent need for his medical attention. The Circuit Court of the First Circuit suppressed the evidence to remedy what it concluded was a constitutional violation, and the State appeals. It asserts there was no invasion of defendant’s constitutional…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Lanza v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. KumukauHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BonnellHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MonizHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Flores v. United Air Lines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kaiama v. AguilarHawaii Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API