Prothro v. Walker
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jexkixs, Chief Jirstice.
1. “Where parties, in the course of the execution of a contract, depart from its terms and pay or receive money under such departure, before either can recover for failure to pursue the letter of the agreement, reasonable notice must be given the other of intention to rely on the exact terms of the agreement. Until such notice, the departure is a quasi new agreement.” Code, § 20-116.(a) The question as to whether or not there has been a mutual intention, and in fact a mutual departure from the terms of an original contract, as contemplated by the above Code section, is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hicks v. BeachamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Southern Feed Stores v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Mauldin v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- DeLamar v. Fidelity Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Craig v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
3Cited by24 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Union Camp Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Tybrisa Co. v. Tybeeland, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- A.P. Development Corp. v. BandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Mayer v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Curl v. Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.