Legal Opinion

Groover v. Tattnall Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1912No. 3745PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Reidsville — Judge Collins.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

Suit was brought upon an account for goods sold and delivered. Over objection of the defendant, the plaintiff was allowed to amend the petition, by alleging, in substance, that the goods described in the bill of particulars were sent to the defendant to be sold for the account of the plaintiff; and that the defendant had sold the goods and collected the money, and had failed and refused to pay over the same to the plaintiff. The objection to this amendment was that it set forth a new and distinct cause of action. We think that the objection was well taken and that the amendment should not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamar v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Chapman v. Americus Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Pittman v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Spikes v. SpikesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Butler v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API