In re Dismissal of Mitchell

Appellant raises in his first proposition of law the issue of whether the Court of Appeals was empowered to review the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas under the provisions of R. C. 119.12.1 Specifically, appellant contends that appellee did not raise a question of law relating to the constitutionality, construction, or interpretation of the statutes or rules of the agency and, therefore, the Court of Appeals lacked the authority to review the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas.

In A. B. Jac., Inc., v. Liquor Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. *882d 139, 280 N.E. 2d 371, a cause involving the…