Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Emmons v. Guckenberger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1936No. 25649 and 25650PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The first question raised by the respondent in the first case alone is the legal capacity of the relators to sue. The complete answer to this contention is that it has been waived by failure to raise the issue by a demurrer or in the answer. Section 11311, General Code; 30 Ohio Jurisprudence, 813.

It is next contended by the respondents that the relators are without authority to conduct a survey to determine whether positions are within the classified civil service. As a basis for the determination of this and the remaining questions, it is necessary to carefully note the broad and mandatory…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. WitterOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Termination of Employment of PrattOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In the Matter of Appeals of Port Murray Dairy Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Barley v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. McAninch v. CrumbleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In re Dismissal of MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API