Morrow v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
This is an out of time appeal 1 from a conviction for burglary. The punishment, enhanced under the provisions of Article 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., twelve years.
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction in that the operator of the business alleged to have been burglarized did not testify nor was she asked if appellant had her consent to enter the building or take her personal property.
Witness Sample testified she occupied and controlled the business known as Sample’s Drive Inn, at 3212 South Oakland, in Dallas, on January 2, 1967,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Baity v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Shelby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ex Parte SlatonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hutchinson v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rios v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte RamirezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Heiskell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Grinage v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.