Legal Opinion

Love Korean Church v. Chertoff

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2008No. 07-55093PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Love Korean Church (the “Church”) appeals an order of the district court affirming the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“CIS”) revocation of a visa petition filed by the Church on behalf its choir director. The Church had sought to have its choir director, a Korean citizen, classified as a “special immigrant” religious worker within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(C). Because the revocation of the visa petition was predicated on legal error and findings of fact unsupported by substantial evidence, we vacate the judgment of the district court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Tongatapu Woodcraft Hawaii, Ltd. v. Sam I. Feldman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fogo De Chao (Holdings) Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. Kazarian v. US Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Herrera v. US Citizenship and Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Mohammad v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Patel v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API