Legal Opinion

Nicolls v. Scranton Club

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 5, 1954No. 11063PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the District Court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant on the issues of defendant's negligence and plaintiff's contributory negligence. The jurisdictional basis of the action is diversity of citizenship and amount. Accordingly, since all the operative facts occurred in Pennsylvania, the law of that state is determinative.

Viewed, as necessary, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the evidence is as follows: The plaintiff is a professional entertainer: a magician. On June 29, 1951, he filled a professional…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Kmiotek v. AnastSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Johnson v. RulonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Grimes v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Anna P. Pieseski, Administratrix of the Estate of John C. Pieseski, Deceased v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation. Anna P. PieseskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API