Legal Opinion

In Re the Probate of the Will of Katz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHtjbbs, J.

In this proceeding in Surrogate’s Court for the probate of a will, probate was denied “ because there is no proof that the attesting witnesses signed ‘ at the request of the testator.’ ” The learned Surrogate filed a written decision denying probate and thereafter a decree based upon such written decision and referred to therein.

It is apparent from a reading of the decision and decree that the Surrogate based his conclusion upon the ground that the statute, section 21 of the Decedent Estate Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 13) required positive direct testimony that the testatrix requested each of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of CottrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. In Re the Revocation of the Last Will & Testament of NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Trustees of Auburn Seminary v. . CalhounNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of AndrewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of ThompsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
  5. In re the Will of HohnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API