Board v. State Ex Rel. Walcott
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
The state will be designated as plaintiff and Mandly Board will be designated as defendant in this opinion.
The state filed its action originally against H. J. Stebbins, alleging Stebbins was the owner of stock in the Central State Bank, which bank had become insolvent and was in charge of the Bank Commissioner, and in# course of liquidation. Stebbins moved to make Mandly Board a party defendant, alleging he had sold the stock to. the said Board, but the same had never been transferred on the stock book of the Central State Bank. The state filed its amended petition making H.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haynes, Admx. v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Jueschke v. SeeleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Simpson v. HillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Carignano v. BoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morton v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Kelley v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Proctor v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935