Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Morgan
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided November 5, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-288-CRSPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles R. Simpson Iii, Senior Judge
I. Introduction
This case is before the Court following an order to show cause. DN 17. The Court entered the order because it had "grave concerns about the propriety of ruling on issues surrounding ongoing state proceedings or final state proceedings which have not been appealed to the courts of the Commonwealth of Kentucky." Id. at 5. Defendants Laura Taylor, Lauren Ingram, and Tareka Morgan, along with Plaintiff George Alexander, responded. DNs 21, 23, 24.1 Defendant Shante Franklin has not. These issues are ripe for review. Finding that the exercise of federal jurisdiction in this case…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ali-Bey v. Van HooseDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Byrdwell v. HellardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Daniel S. Greenberg v. Heather C. Ross, Senior Assistant Attorney General, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- George Alexander v. Tareka MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
- Greenberg v. RossDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.