Legal Opinion

Byrdwell v. Hellard

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided September 8, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00041Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at FRANKFORT JOSEPH MATTHEW BYRDWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 3: 21-41-HRW ) V. ) ) S. MARIE HELLARD, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendant. ) *** *** *** *** Plaintiff Joseph Byrdwell is a resident of Smithfield, Kentucky. Proceeding without an attorney, Byrdwell has filed a civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, naming Kentucky Family Court Judge S. Marie Hellard in her official capacity as the sole defendant. [D. E. No. 1] Byrdwell has paid the filing fee. [D. E. No. 1-2] In his complaint, Byrdwell…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API