Legal Opinion

Elmore v. McConaghy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. 12975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, E. P. Whiting, judge pro tempore, entered December 15, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The plaintiff, A. S. Elmore, and the defendant, Hugh McConaghy, formed a copartnership as coal dealers in the year 1909. On June 30, 1913, they dissolved partnership by agreement, McConaghy buying out Elmore’s interest for $2,600, paying $600 in cash, and giving twenty promissory notes for $100 each, dated August 22, 1913, bearing six per cent interest until paid, the notes maturing monthly in a series running from one to twenty months after date. After seven of these monthly notes had been paid, McConaghy refused to make further payments until a readjustment of their prior settlement should…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Hardwick & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  2. Merriwether v. HardemanTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Scheuer v. BerringerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Quinlan v. KeiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Little v. LittleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karle v. SederWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  3. Jacobsen v. ArntzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API