Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. Harty

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1993No. 2-92-255-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILL, Chief Justice.

The City of Fort Worth appeals the trial court’s judgment that William E. Harty, John W. Powell, and Gary D. Wigley, the appellees, are police officers as defined in chapter 143, Local Government Code, particularly section 143.003(5); that they were appointed in substantial compliance with chapter 143; and that they are therefore entitled to civil service status as employees of the City of Fort Worth.

The City urges in three points of error that the doctrines of stare decisis, res judica-ta, and collateral estoppel bar retrial of the issue as to whether city park…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Fort Worth v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Quick, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  2. Ector County v. HollmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Texas Employment Commission v. Remington York, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  4. Agbor v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  5. Paul v. Houston Police Officers' UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API