Hernandez v. City of Fort Worth
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Court of Civil Appeals has held that Park Rangers, employed by the City of Fort Worth Park Department, are not policemen within the definition of the Firemen’s and Policemen's Civil Service Act, Article 1269m, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., because Park Rangers are not selected, appointed or promoted to classified positions within the Police Department as required by the Act. 608 S.W.2d 826, We agree and, accordingly, refuse the Application for Writ of Error, no reversible error.
Although this holding disposes of the controversy, the CCA additionally held that it had no jurisdiction to consider…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. EwtonTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Tarver v. TarverTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Dallas Electric Supply Co. v. Branum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Rimco Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas Electric Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Donwerth v. Preston II Chrysler-Dodge, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Lone Star Ford, Inc. v. McCormick, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Sheldon L. Pollack Corp. v. Falcon Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Dean v. Lafayette Place (Section One) Council of Co-Owners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.