Legal Opinion

Paul v. Houston Police Officers' Union

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 2002No. 14-00-01576-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice.

Appellants Roy Paul, et al., fifty-six arson investigators employed by the Houston Fire Department, ask us to hold they are actually “police officers,” and thus include them in the City of Houston’s contract governing employees in the Houston Police Department. We hold that they are not, and affirm the summary judgment below. In 1993, the Texas Legislature shifted control of employment matters for the Houston Fire Department from the state to the local level. Under the statute, fire fighters in Houston (excluding only the department head and his assistants)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Fort Worth v. HartyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, LLC v. Motor Vehicle Board & Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  2. BMW of North America, LLC v. Motor Vehicle Board and Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Autobahn Imports, Inc. D/B/A Autobahn Motorcars, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  3. BMW of North America, LLC v. Motor Vehicle Board and Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Autobahn Imports, Inc. D/B/A Autobahn Motorcars, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  4. Lakeith Amir-Sharif, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API