State Ex Rel. Kimmons v. City of Azle
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
In a proceeding in the nature of Quo Warranto the State was denied relief it sought by a summary judgment granted to defendants/respondents City of Azle and its officials. The State appealed.
We affirm.
Giving rise to the complaint of those who are the relators, upon the petition of whom the State (through the District Attorney of Tarrant County) sought and obtained leave to file the suit, was Azle’s enactment of a certain ordinance purporting to annex territory which belonged to relators. Attack was upon the authority of Azle, as the home rule city it claimed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walling v. North Central Texas Municipal Water AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Bassel v. ShanklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- State ex rel. City of Azle v. City of SanctuaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- City of Azle v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- Honts v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Nichols v. Seei, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- State ex rel. City of Weatherford v. Town of Hudson OaksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- City of Granite Shoals v. WinderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Bob Honts and Herman "Tex" Moten, Sr. v. Jim Shaw and Mark A. Wallace, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.