Legal Opinion

Dykstra v. Department of Natural Resources

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1993No. Docket 139567PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHood, P.J.

This is an action for a declaratory ruling concerning the validity of an administrative rule. The trial court granted summary disposition in plaintiffs’ favor, finding the rule invalid. Defendant appeals as of right. We reverse.

Plaintiffs, all of whom own farms, entered into development rights agreements under the Farmland and Open Space Preservation Act, MCL 554.701 et seq.; MSA 26.1287(1) et seq. They seek to terminate those agreements before their expiration dates, presumably so that they can sell the land to private developers. Plaintiffs challenge the validity of a rule promulgated by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Luttrell v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blank v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Michigan Farm Bureau v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Blank v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Roger Turunen v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Canterbury Health Care, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API