Legal Opinion

Country-Wide Insurance v. Wagoner

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart F. Hancock, J.

This uninsured motorist arbitration proceeding involves the interpretation of the standard New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement (Endorsement), as found in three policies of insurance issued by two insurance companies. One policy was issued by the petitioner, Country-Wide Insurance Company (Country-Wide), to cover a motorcycle owned by Daniel Wagoner. The other two policies were issued by the respondent, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), to cover an automobile owned *977by Daniel Wagoner and an automobile owned by Clifford Wagoner, Daniel’s father. Respondent Aetna has…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance v. Atlantic National InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. In re the Arbitration between Sentry Insurance & AmselNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Davis v. De FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Davis v. De FrankNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. GodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Country-Wide Insurance v. WagonerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Reichel v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Country-Wide Insurance v. WagonerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API