Legal Opinion

Barr v. MacGugan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 3, 2003No. 51428-8-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Allison Barr’s lawsuit against John MacGugan was dismissed after her attorney failed to comply with an order compelling responses to discovery re*45quests. Unbeknownst to her and the court, Barr’s attorney was suffering from severe clinical depression. When Barr learned of the dismissal, she successfully moved to vacate the order of dismissal under CR 60(b). MacGugan contends on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion when it reinstated Barr’s lawsuit. We find no abuse of discretion, because her attorney’s mental illness, of which Barr was unaware, constituted extraordinary…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Community Dental Services, Dba Smilecare Dental Group v. Stuart Tani, DdsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. L. P. Steuart, Inc. v. Joseph H. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. MA Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Tatham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Barr v. MacGuganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Ha v. Signal Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API