Legal Opinion
Barr v. MacGugan
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 3, 2003No. 51428-8-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
78 P.3d 660 (2003)
Allison BARR, Respondent,
v.
John MacGUGAN and Jane Doe MacGugan, husband and wife, and their marital community, Appellants.
No. 51428-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
November 3, 2003.
Keith A. Bolton, Bolton & Carey, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.
Andrea A. Darvas, Attorney at Law, Burien, WA, for Respondent.
COLEMAN, J.
Alison Barr's lawsuit against John MacGugan was dismissed after her attorney failed to comply with an order compelling responses to discovery requests. Unbeknownst to her and the court, Barr's attorney was suffering from severe clinical depression.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Community Dental Services, Dba Smilecare Dental Group v. Stuart Tani, DdsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- L. P. Steuart, Inc. v. Joseph H. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- MA Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Tatham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Ha v. Signal Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Stanley v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.