Legal Opinion

Guillot v. Hagman

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1939No. Civ. 12006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrail, P. J.

This is an appeal by the Kelley Kar Company from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of a collision between an automobile, driven by defendant Earl Hagman, and plaintiff as a pedestrian. It is the contention of the appellant that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, and that as a matter of law defendant Earl Hagman was not guilty of any negligence. It is our duty to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.

The accident occurred after dark on September 26, 1937, at the intersection of Eureka Drive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bunch v. KinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. McQuigg v. ChildsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Schmidt v. CIT CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stoddart v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Johnson v. BarreiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Leplat v. Raley Wiles Auto SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Traders Etc. Ins. Co. v. Pac. Emp. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API