Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tamez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 2001No. 1857-1862PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · JohnsonJohnson, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., and PRICE, HOLLAND, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.

Appellant filed six applications for pretrial writs of habeas corpus, claiming that her prosecutions under Tex.Pen.Code §§ 37.03 and 37.06 1 were barred by the statute of limitations. The trial court denied habeas corpus relief. At the court of appeals, appellant argued that the state’s reliance on § 37.06 barred her prosecution for aggravated perjury on limitations grounds. She noted that § 37.06 requires the state to show inconsistent statements, made under oath, without proving which…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DickersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ex Parte MangrumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Ex Parte Tamez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

4Cited by58 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WeiseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Ex Parte DosterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. Ahmad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Phillips, William RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API