Legal Opinion

Ahmad v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 2005No. 2-04-476-CRPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

Appellant Janet Kay Ahmad seeks to appeal the denial of her motion to set aside the indictment on limitations grounds. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant filed a motion in the trial court seeking to set aside the indictment, contending that prosecution of the conduct alleged is barred by the statute of limitations. The trial court denied the motion, and Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

The right to appeal in a criminal case is a substantive right solely within the province of the Legislature. Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 734…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apolinar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. State v. SellersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Bridle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. Ex parte AlvearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Alice Vega Fiala v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2017
  4. Cetewayo Shango v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2025
  5. Chris Prestonbach v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API