Legal Opinion
Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 2009No. 08-35278PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOODWIN; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Kris Indergard (“Indergard”) appeals a summary judgment in favor of Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“GP”) in her action for damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Oregon disability law. GP argues that there was no error in the district court, and that Indergard failed to exhaust administrative remedies under the ADA. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Indergard worked at GP’s Wauna mill facility from December 27, 1984, until February…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Richard A. Sullivan v. River Valley School District, and Charles O. Williams, Superintendent, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Cripe v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Emily Kroll v. White Lake Ambulance AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Porfiri v. Moure-ErasoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Julia Taylor v. Renown HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- James v. James Marine, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.