Farran v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioner owned a building in Brooklyn which was subject to the Rent Stabilization Law (see, Administrative Code of City of New York § 26-504). On March 17, 1984, two tenants who resided in one of the petitioner’s apartments filed a complaint with the New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board alleging a rent overcharge. On April 1, 1984, the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) assumed the responsibility of determining the rent overcharge complaint. The petitioner advised *758the DHCR that, in 1982, while the apartment was vacant, he installed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aguayo v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Seril v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Blackmer v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lyons v. WhiteheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002