Warner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL, District Judge.
The matter presently before the Court is defendant Norfolk & Western Railway Company’s (hereinafter “Norfolk & Western’s”) motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for damages pursuant to a theory of strict liability in this consolidated civil action. Essentially, the plaintiffs argue that they were injured as a result of a collision between the vehicle in which they were travelling and a train owned and operated by defendant Norfolk & Western. According to the plaintiffs, the operation of a train is an “ultra-hazardous” or “abnormally dangerous”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Philip Morris, Inc. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Siegler v. KuhlmanWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Luthringer v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arlington Forest Associates v. Exxon Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Tyco Fire Products LPDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011