Legal Opinion

Warner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided January 30, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-0016-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MICHAEL, District Judge.

The matter presently before the Court is defendant Norfolk & Western Railway Company’s (hereinafter “Norfolk & Western’s”) motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for damages pursuant to a theory of strict liability in this consolidated civil action. Essentially, the plaintiffs argue that they were injured as a result of a collision between the vehicle in which they were travelling and a train owned and operated by defendant Norfolk & Western. According to the plaintiffs, the operation of a train is an “ultra-hazardous” or “abnormally dangerous”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Philip Morris, Inc. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Siegler v. KuhlmanWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Luthringer v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arlington Forest Associates v. Exxon Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Tyco Fire Products LPDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API