Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Tyco Fire Products LP
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 23, 2011No. 08 C 2838PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RONALD A. GUZMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Company and Kmart Corporation (collectively referred to herein as “Sears”) filed suit against Tyco Fire Products LP and SimplexGrinnell LP for negligence and strict product liability and SimplexGrinnell LP for breach of contract.1 Defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons provided in this Memorandum and Opinion, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion.
Facts
This litigation arises out of the inadvertent activation of Model F950 fire sprinkler heads in Sears’ stores…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CorningDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Estrada v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Pursell v. Hydrochem LLC.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
- Thompson v. Brasscraft Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021