Legal Opinion

State v. Allex

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 4, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

257 N.J. Super. 16 (1992)

608 A.2d 1

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

HARRY P. ALLEX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 13, 1992.

Decided June 4, 1992.

Before Judges GAULKIN[1], MUIR, Jr. and LANDAU.

John S. Furlong argued the cause for appellant.

James L. McConnell, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Nicholas L. Bissell, Jr., Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney; James L. McConnell, of counsel and on the letter brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, JR., J.A.D.

On this appeal it is once again argued that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. HammondSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Peprah v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. State v. GheganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GordonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  2. Peprah v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. State v. CareyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API