Legal Opinion

Carroll v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 18, 1982No. Civ. H-79-1589PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, District Judge:

This is another of the many civil actions brought by persons who received inocula tions pursuant to the National Swine Flu Immunization Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 247b, and who later suffered from the serious neurological disorder known as Guillain-Barre Syndrome (hereinafter “GBS”). Clifford M. Carroll, plaintiff herein, received a swine flu shot on October 18, 1976. Many months later he was diagnosed as having contracted GBS. In this action, plaintiff is seeking substantial damages from the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. William H. Price, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  2. Ina M. Overton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  4. Adams v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Musick v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1991
  2. Eastern Bridge v. Bette & CringDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Slattery v. Disney WorldDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Cutler v. GilbertDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Environamics v. Master PumpDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API