Bolton v. Marshall
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
At the outset of this opinion, it is important to note that under the pleadings and the evidence in this case there is no claim or proof of any express agreement between plaintiffs and defendant covering the services actually to be performed by plaintiffs and the amount they were to receive therefor.
If, under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence, it can be said there was any implied understanding between the parties on the subject of attorney fees, the reasonable deduction is that it would comprehend fees in such amount as might be allowed and approved by the Probate Court having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dickinson v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Goodkind v. WolkowskySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Roberts v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Gamewell v. KillionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dombey, Tyler, Richards & Grieser v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Ullmann v. Olwine, Connelly, Chase, O'Donnell & WeyherDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- Michael D. Tully Co., L.P.A. v. DollneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.