Legal Opinion

Bolton v. Marshall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1950No. 31847PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

At the outset of this opinion, it is important to note that under the pleadings and the evidence in this case there is no claim or proof of any express agreement between plaintiffs and defendant covering the services actually to be performed by plaintiffs and the amount they were to receive therefor.

If, under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence, it can be said there was any implied understanding between the parties on the subject of attorney fees, the reasonable deduction is that it would comprehend fees in such amount as might be allowed and approved by the Probate Court having…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Goodkind v. WolkowskySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Roberts v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gamewell v. KillionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Dombey, Tyler, Richards & Grieser v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Ullmann v. Olwine, Connelly, Chase, O'Donnell & WeyherDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
  5. Michael D. Tully Co., L.P.A. v. DollneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API