Kennedy v. Banks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Presiding Judge.
1. The first two enumerations are based on the following excerpts from the instructions to the jury: (1) “One would not be justified in assuming that a child would exercise the same degree of care for his safety as an adult under the circumstances,” (2) “nor is one justified in presuming that a child near the highway will remain in a place of safety.” Immediately following these excerpts the court continued, “I further charge you that motorists owe very young children a greater duty than they owe to normal adults. The question of whether the defendant used the legally…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wright v. DilbeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Smith v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Harris v. HardmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Reed v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Waldrop v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.