Dougherty County Council of Architects v. Beckanstin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The first question to- be decided is to determine if the superior court judge erred in sustaining the certiorari. The effect of sustaining a certiorari is the same as the first grant of a new trial. Jeffers v. Central of Ga. R. Co., 1 Ga. App. 331 (57 S. E. 923); Folds v. Harris, 34 Ga. App. 445 (129 S. E. 664); Peacock v. American Plant Co., 49 Ga. App. 267 (175 S. E. 262). As the plaintiff in error’s counsel in his excellent brief concedes that the granting of a certiorari is discretionary with the trial judge, and as there is no- showing of an abuse of discretion, this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Faulkner v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Mumford v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Folds v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Jeffers v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Department of Human Resources v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Department of Human Resources v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Department of Human Resources v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975