Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1955No. 35856PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

1. Under the general grounds of the motion for new trial the defendant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the verdict. Where there is a conflict in the evidence, the jury (in this case the judge) has the prerogative to determine the credibility of the witnesses who appear and testify; and where the verdict is. supported by some evidence, the appellate courts will not reverse the judgment of the trial judge in overruling a ground of a motion for a new trial based upon the assignment that the verdict is without evidence to support it.

In the case at bar a witness…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wootten v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Burk v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Kirkwood Gymnasium & Armory Hall Ass'n v. Van NessMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Mayor of Americus v. GammageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Christiansen v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Dills v. BohannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Rossville Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Sims v. HoffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API