Legal Opinion
Bowen v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1929No. 5251PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was employed by appellee as a rubber calendar operator from 1915 to 1924. In 1916 the appellee established a system “of suggestions and awards” whereby it invited its employees to submit suggestions pertaining to improvements in methods of production. These suggestions were received by a committee which made small awards for those that were approved. In May of 1921 appellant submitted the suggestion set out in the margin. He had previously submitted other suggestions and received awards. Acting upon the one in question, appellee’s experimental engineer,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Z. T. Osborn, Jr., Z. T. Osborn, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Papazian v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
- Why Corporation v. Super Ironer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Brown v. L. v. Marks & Sons Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1946