Why Corporation v. Super Ironer Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, claiming ownership of Patent No. 1,624,698, brought an infringement suit against appellee. The validity of the patent and the manufacture and sale by appellee of machines embodying the invention were admitted; but, defensively, appellee asserted its own title to the patent. The district court sustained the defense and dismissed appellant’s action on the merits. While laches was also set up and upheld, that issue, though properly adjudged in the district court for the aid of the reviewing court, is immaterial here; should it be determined that the legal title…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re Great Lakes Transit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- John Tuman & Sons, Inc. v. BasseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Bowen v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wesley T. Bailey v. Chattem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Englert Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- All Steel Engines, Inc. v. Taylor Engines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
- F. A. R. Liquidating Corp. v. McGraneryDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- City Bank & Trust Co. v. Otto Fabric, Inc. (In Re Otto Fabric, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.