United States v. Joseph A. Lattus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The defendant was charged with three counts of violating 26 U.S.C. § 7206{1), willfully and knowingly making and subscribing federal individual income tax returns which he did not believe to be true and correct for the years 1968, 1969 and 1970. In a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of the charges for 1969 and 1970 and was acquitted with respect to 1968. The contention on appeal that the verdict was fatally inconsistent is without merit. “Consistency in the verdict is not necessary. Each count in an indictment is regarded as if it was a separate indictment.” Dunn v. United States, 284…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Fred T. MacKeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Robert E. RathCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. David A. Sturman (90-3147) Ralph L. Levine (90-3148) Reuben Sturman (90-3151) and Melvin Kaminsky (90-3750)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John E. ScalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. SabinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. James Wesley GustusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Joe SabinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001