Legal Opinion

Kay v. Fairview Riverside Hospital

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1995No. C8-95-168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the summary judgment in favor of respondents on appellant’s claims of negligence and violation of the Vulnerable Adult Act. Appellant also challenges the denial of his motion to amend the complaint. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 9, 1993, appellant’s mother, decedent Mary Rita Kay, was admitted to the hospice unit at respondent Fairview Riv erside Hospital (Riverside). Decedent had been diagnosed as having terminal cancer. Before her admission, decedent’s physician had placed her on “do not resuscitate/do not intubate” (DNR/DNI) status. Upon decedent’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Hunt v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Wegener v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anker v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Education Minnesota-Greenway, Local 1330 v. Independent School District No. 316Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API